Nakane's Theory and Communication
Introduction
- Chie Nakane's theory has helped me make sense of much of what I have experienced at KGU. I hope it helps you too.
- My primary purpose is to explain some comunicative tendiecies of Japanese students and suggest some strategies for dealing with them. In the process, I hope to shed some light on the nature of Japanese universities.
Nakane's Theory
- We can identify ourselves by either frame or attribute.
- Japanese society is characterized by stress on frame as opposed to attribute.
Structural reinforcement
- "Enterprise unions" illustrate the emphasis on frame.
- The threat that attribute poses to the integrity of the frame is literally "contained."
- Lifetime employment also strengthens frame.
- This is further reinforced by the practice of intraorganizational transfers.
Affective reinforcement
- Initiation ceremonies foster a general sense of membership.
- This is very different from a job description.
- Parties and trips reinforce a feeling of belonging.
Hierarchy and authority
- The hierarchy is organized primarily by seniority, not merit.
- Stress on merit, an attribute, might threaten the frame.
- Weak leaders take care of subordinates in exchange for help from them.
Implications for Communication
Maintaining appearances
- Language patterns require speakers to constantly "pay homage" to the leader.
- Opinions are often expressed in private.
- Ambiguity and subtle expressions allow alert listeners to catch a speaker's drift, while providing the speaker with plausible deniability.
Controlling logic
- Emotional intelligence (EQ) is often more important than adherence to abstract rules of logic.
- Here too, maintaining appearances is paramount.
- Idealization of logic is idealization of the perspective of the outsider and hence anathema to the frame.
- The listerner's habit of reading a great deal into each statement makes "thinking aloud" difficult and dangerous. (A "particularistic" world view makes abstraction difficult.)
- Thus, emphasis on frame leads to:
- concern about how one's statements will be interpreted by others;
- need to become acquainted with others before communicating;
- preference for ambiguous statements;
- tendency to take criticism personally;
- hesitancy to disagree openly with others;
- inclination to consider ideas carefully before voicing them;
- a disinclination to think in abstract or purely logical terms.
|